PGConf.Russia 2025

Many developers often face performance issues in the systems they develop. One common solution for optimizing slow business processes is parallelization. But what do you do if the bottleneck is the data insertion into the database, which needs to maintain atomicity?

In this talk, I’ll explain how to speed up data insertion by parallelizing the process in Spring, while ensuring the atomicity of the entire operation. We'll cover batch updates in Spring and PostgreSQL, discuss why updates are heavy operations, and explore ways to speed up the process in the current tech stack. Additionally, I will present other approaches to maintaining atomicity and demonstrate their differences in benchmarks.

This will be useful for practicing engineers.

The execution time of SQL queries depends on factors like indexes and up-to-date statistics. In most cases, optimizing slow queries helps resolve database performance issues.

But what if classic query optimization doesn’t work? What if the system keeps behaving unpredictably — or worse, crashes, leading to frustration, panic, and even despair?

In this talk, we’ll explore how Postgres Professional’s performance engineers tackle these challenges, look at the tools they use, what’s still missing, and where PostgreSQL performance optimization is headed

This talk will likely be of interest to network providers who can enhance their cool features by adding something to the syntax to simplify administration, as well as anyone interested in machine learning. We will explore the SQL parsing mechanism, what, where, and how to modify it in order to introduce new syntax constructs. Additionally, I will demonstrate the capabilities of machine learning on tabular data, all within the database, using the new syntax.

Diagnostic Methods: Analyzing the Issue of Long CREATE DATABASE Execution

This talk covers two cases of long CREATE DATABASE execution in PostgreSQL 11, which, in a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster configuration, caused node failover due to a monitoring timeout from the clustering software. The first case is related to a large shared buffers size, while the second involves the use of the WITH OWNER option during database creation and a large pg_shdepend system table (a feature of using the jBPM software).