PGConf.Russia 2025

This talk will likely be of interest to network providers who can enhance their cool features by adding something to the syntax to simplify administration, as well as anyone interested in machine learning. We will explore the SQL parsing mechanism, what, where, and how to modify it in order to introduce new syntax constructs. Additionally, I will demonstrate the capabilities of machine learning on tabular data, all within the database, using the new syntax.

This talk explores the challenges we encountered — and solved — while migrating massive databases from Oracle to PostgreSQL.

One of the most complex aspects of this process was rebuilding foreign keys (FKs). To overcome these challenges, we had to dive deep into the internal workings of FK creation and validation.

Key topics include:

Does ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT ... FOREIGN KEY have an execution plan?

Can an ordinary user influence this process?

What locks are applied during FK creation and validation?

Also, we’ll introduce a first-principles method for investigating performance issues, applying it to a real-world FK creation bottleneck.

I’ll talk about the challenges you’ll face if you decide to implement a new TableAM. What to choose: Generic XLog or Custom RMGR? Why use a Custom SMGR? How to integrate PostgreSQL allocators into third-party libraries, even if they don't officially support it? What’s missing for a columnar engine (including vectorization and late materialization), and how can we work around those limitations?

In the second part, I’ll dive into the internals of pgpro_tam — a new native table engine for OLAP that supports standard data formats, various SMGRs, and, if needed, third-party schedulers and execution engines, all while adhering to ACID principles. This is designed to achieve the fastest analytics on PostgreSQL (not just plugging in DuckDB).

Last year, we introduced built-in fault tolerance support in Postgres Pro Enterprise through BiHA. Our solution allows you to deploy a fault-tolerant Postgres cluster where, in the event of a failure of the primary node, a new primary node (leader) is automatically selected.

However, this brings up the issue of redirecting traffic to the new leader. This can be solved using our Proxima extension or an external TCP proxy server. Both solutions needed to periodically query the BiHA cluster to determine the primary node.

As an alternative, the latest version of BiHA introduced the ability to register custom functions that will be triggered by events such as leader change, node addition/removal, and others. We call this mechanism user callbacks. In this presentation, we’ll explain how the callbacks are implemented and discuss their usage.