PgConf.Russia 2019

Reliable backup and recovery, at enterprise level for the PostgreSQL environment. No more traditional backups. CBT (Change Block Tracking) technology is the next generation incremental backup. Faster than snapshots, CBT back up blocks that change, not all of your data, reducing server and network traffic and eliminating the need for traditional backups. Benefits: • Data protection mode close to Real-Time • Update with ease

This report focuses on the continuation of transferring our ECM “Priority” from MS SQL to Postgres. Technical solutions, issues of rewriting from T-SQL to plpgsql, optimization of the effective code and moving data will be covered. Additionally, there will be considered aspects of pgplsql performance testing to find the “bad code” of pgplsql as a candidate for optimization. The main objective of the presentation is to answer the question: "We have it in T-SQL - how to transfer it in PG?". The report is intended for junior Postgres developers and is a continuation of the previous report made at the conference in 2017(https://youtu.be/v6_4Szr8t14).

This case study walks participants through a case where we decided to embark on a data recovery effort. This talk is applicable to all users, from novices to advanced PostgreSQL database administrators. Beginners will get an understanding of what data recovery is and is not, what expectations to have going into it, and how to work with contracted experts in order to ensure the best possible outcome, while more advanced users and experts will also get a fair bit out of the technical aspects of the case study.

While the talk will emphasize non-technical operational aspects of data recovery, it will also include discussions of the internals of PostgreSQL we had to work with, as well as how we went about approaching difficulties so that we could retrieve the data we hoped to.

While doing development of one of our project we were asked to build HA database using Postgres, geographically distributed.

First our choice was obvious, we started to work with big 3 cloud providers, but soon it was quite understand that everything costs big enough for us. Also there were a bunch of incompatibilities with unsupported extensions as well as londiste replication we were heavily used.

I will talk about why we chose patroni, what types of problem we faced with and patroni's special features can dramatically simplify deploy and everyday usage.